We were just cruising through Genesis when my professor gave
us an assignment: “Read Genesis 18 and give a written response. Please explain why Abraham is more merciful
than God.” So go ahead, you do the
assignment and I’ll do the assignment and we’ll compare notes.
The Bible is sometimes called “The Good Book.” I think that’s
because it talks about God’s love for the world, and tells us that we should be
nice to each other, and if we are faithful to God life will be all butterflies,
rainbows, and puppies. Right? I hope there’s more to it than that. In fact, if we do take the Bible seriously, I
think we have to deal with the sometimes dark side of Scripture. While there exist stories and passages that are
so beautiful and true to life, it’s hard not to be moved by the words, there
also exist stories and passages that reveal the darkest capacities of the human
person and human societies. If we aren’t
careful, we may even see a God that is angry and outright maniacal. It is
our responsibility to understand why these stories exist at all, and how they
should form us.
Genesis 18 may not be the darkest example from Scripture,
but if you did the assignment (you will send it to me right?) you will see that
it’s hard to understand why Abraham has to try so hard to change God’s mind
about destroying two cities. God is
supposed to be the all loving, most merciful Father right? Why is Abraham the hero trying to stop the
wrath of God? Shouldn’t it be the other
way around? Well here was my best shot
at the assignment:
The final portion of Genesis 18 tells
the story of God’s intention to judge Sodom and Gomorrah. A cursory reading makes it seem like God
intended to completely destroy both cities, and if it were not for the intervention
of Abraham, the just would perish with the unjust. Rightly were the questions raised at the end
of class: Why is Abraham more merciful
than God? Why is Abraham so courageous
in approaching God, when in the past he was content to listen and obey? How does he get the idea to intervene?
A more careful reading of verse 21
would show that God’s intention was to assess the situation, not necessarily to
destroy the cities. “Therefore, I will
go down now and see whether or not they are carrying out the outcry coming to
Me concerning them.” It is the reader’s
assumption that God would destroy everyone if He concluded that the cities
would be destroyed. We do not know what
God would have done about the presence of the righteous. Abraham slowly worked God down to spare the
city if only 10 righteous were found.
Considering the violent culture of the patriarchs and monarchs, it is
unlikely that Abraham was concerned for the lives of the unrighteous. Rather, he was most likely solely concerned
for the survival of his nephew Lot. Lot
was found to be one righteous person in the city. While this does not meet the agreed number of
ten to spare the city, God does not wipe out the righteous with the
unrighteous. Lot and his family are
spared. Even further, on account of
Lot’s plea, God spares the city of Zoar.
The text suggests that God’s intention from the beginning of the episode
was not to destroy all. Instead God
meant to save the righteous from the hands of the unrighteous people of the
city of Sodom (Genesis 19:11-16).
Still, we are left with this
interesting encounter between God and Abraham in chapter 18. Abraham is acting as a model of intercession
and participation in the mission of God. First we see in Abraham a genuine concern for
those he intercedes for. It is this
concern that gives him the boldness to approach God.
We see Abraham’s humility. “Indeed now, I who am but dust and ashes have
taken it upon myself to speak to the Lord” (v 27). He does not presume to know better than God.
Abraham acknowledges that God is indeed
just (v 25). While we might be inclined
to use accolades to butter someone up so that she would hear us, Abraham is
exemplifying prayer, not coercion.
Finally Abraham acts in a way that
resonates with our own experience. When we see a situation that seems unjust,
we want to effect change. God is willing
to listen to Abraham’s prayer, and in doing so allows Abraham to participate in
His mission to save the righteous of the city.
In class, my professor offered a different view. I’m not saying his is better…yes I am. Take a look at it, and let me know what you
think.
A common perception of God and God’s decision making
process, was that He was like a king (not an unfamiliar image) who consulted
with an advisory council. As a heavenly
king, God consulted a council of angels.
The best example that comes to mind from class was back in Genesis 1:26
when God said, “Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.” Have you ever wondered who God was talking
to? Some folks insist that the “our”
refers to the members of the Trinity.
That would be a convenient route to go if the Trinity was already
revealed. However, our Jewish brothers
and sisters read this text without any notion of the Trinity. My
professor suggested that here was evidence of the heavenly, angelic council
being consulted. Back to Abraham. God had already made a covenant with Abraham,
and brought him into His inner circle.
It was after considering that Abraham will one day be a great nation
through whom all the nations will be blessed that God decided to consult with
Abraham (vv. 17-19). He was being brought into the heavenly court for
consultation.
When was the last time God asked you for consultation? I have a sense that if God were to consult me
about something, how I respond may say more about me than it would about what
is the best course of action. Abraham
had encountered God, and entered into covenant with Him, and now we get to see
if anything changed for Abraham. How had
the covenant changed him?
The text says that “Abraham remained before the Lord.” (v.
22). How would you proceed if you stood
before God as an advisor? “Destroy the
sinners?” “Make them pay for their
crimes?” “You can kill all the unrighteous,
but just save my nephew?” Or perhaps you
would feel ill-equipped (like me) and just go along with whatever God
says. Not Abraham. Abraham allowed his covenantal relationship to inform his “advice.” He stood before the
Lord, a phrase that is very priestly, to intercede not just for his nephew, but
for the cities. His relationship to humanity was different
because of the covenant. And rightly
so. If all of the nations of the world
would be blessed through him, he needed to start showing compassion toward all
the nations.
We the readers are covenanted with God. How merciful will we be? The text challenges us to be like
Abraham. How merciful was he? With a literary device we learn that Abraham was more merciful than even God. That is what the covenant requires of us.
The conclusion that I come to is that all we really know about God is what He has revealed to us through The Holy Spirit and through His Story as recorded in scripture. God reveals Himself to us in such a way that we can understand, but maybe not always comprehend. If you look back at the Flood, God appears to be "sorry" that He created humanity, as if God made a mistake. But was God actually sorry, or did He reveal the depth that sin had broken the relationship between us and Him to the point where it seemed to us that He was sorry He made us? Perhaps this narrative is in the same vein. What appears to us to be one thing might actually be something else.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your thoughts. You are right, and I would add that its probably better to exercise humility and caution when interpreting difficult passages. I am of the opinion that those who told, wrote, and compiled these stories were not ignorant about the difficulties. So we need to ask "What are the authors trying to convey about history and about God?"
Delete